<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>davezor.net - Latest Comments</title><link>http://davezor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://davezor.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:47:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thin slicing and artificial neural networks</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2009/10/thin-slicing-and-artificial-neural-networks/#comment-384608932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The advantages of Developing&lt;br&gt;Intuition&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Unleashes your imagination and creativity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Helps identify and address problems&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Reduce stress more effectively&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Integrates right and left brain functions and gives you a more comprehensive&lt;br&gt;perception on issues&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">listening to intuition</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding new music</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2009/05/finding-new-music/#comment-289946275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a different form of opinion that many people don’t usually talk about. Usually when I find stuff like this I stumble it. Even though this time I’m unsure if this would be best for the users. I will be sure to submit something else though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Discover New Music</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:59:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: holy crap</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/03/holy-crap/#comment-162972735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats, sounds like an exciting place to be! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yaymukund</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: what else can we learn from git?</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/02/what-else-can-we-learn-from-git/#comment-156400618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the current status of Djangy?  I noticed you mentioned it in past tense here, and there have been no updates on the Djangy blog since December.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloomberg radio for startup news</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/01/bloomberg-radio-for-startup-news/#comment-147176239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Financial institutions make their livelihood by predicting and quickly reacting to events related to their diverse portfolio of positions.  Up to the minute news lets traders perform trades quicker and more accurately, netting larger profits if they're smart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Startups need to focus on building their product and market share.  Ambient intelligence of what's going on can help you improve your business and technical strategy, but up-to-the-minute updates are more distracting than they are useful.  A typical startup can't reposition itself in the market fast enough for there to be much difference between news that's a minute, an hour, or a day old.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sameer Sundresh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:23:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: online conversations</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/02/online-conversations/#comment-146339134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I seem to recall this being one of etacts's goals before they got bought up by &lt;a href="http://salesforce.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="salesforce.com"&gt;salesforce.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reverse Engineering the newest Facebook invite virus</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/05/reverse-engineering-the-newest-facebook-invite-virus/#comment-146735646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I got a facebook virus, someone sent me a photo in a chat message, clicked on it, and what do you know? I got rid of it though...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook Virus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloomberg radio for startup news</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/01/bloomberg-radio-for-startup-news/#comment-146735502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it's definitely possible that the market doesn't exist.  I wonder -- what would it take to do this?  Bloomberg radio seems to be 24/7, so it may be tough to do without incurring a huge startup cost.  Perhaps this is best suited as a podcast, but that would sort of eliminate the "realtime" aspect of it.  Hackers would hate to need to tune in at a specific time each day, so that option is out.I wonder how we'd go about trying this out with an MVP.  Seems pretty difficult.  But there has to be a sweet spot somewhere....doesn't there?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Paola</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloomberg radio for startup news</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2011/01/bloomberg-radio-for-startup-news/#comment-146735498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo Laporte on TWiT is trying to be the "CNN of Tech" - but not necessarily the "Bloomberg of Startups" - would there be enough of a market for this? Maybe a text-to-speech online radio network could be created to begin (Iow recurring costs)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own climbing gym?</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/12/my-own-climbing-gym/#comment-146735537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We played add-on all night once. Kept having to redeclare the start because we forgot it so many times.I could go on for hours with the climbing stories. Basically, I think your point on skills kicks ass, and if you have the shot at making your own wall, do it. We did, and it was so key.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mitchell Hislop</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own climbing gym?</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/12/my-own-climbing-gym/#comment-146735535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet, that's a great idea.  We used to play the game where each person would add one movement to the route and everyone would build on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Paola</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own climbing gym?</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/12/my-own-climbing-gym/#comment-146735526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to be a professional rock climber. When setting routes, we would cover the wall in holds, then take them off until we could just do it, and then tweak. Spin some around, make the crimps smaller or change them to slopers, that sort of thing. There is more you can do to make it tough. One thing we tried is not cleaning holds. This makes even the same route you just rocked way harder. This is akin to going at your skill a different way - still making a webapp, just not using your favorite framework or language.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mitchell Hislop</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting exim4 to relay to non standard ports</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2009/11/getting-exim4-to-relay-to-non-standard-ports/#comment-146735731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to use this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Freedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup idea: running assistant</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2009/06/startup-idea-running-assistant/#comment-146735890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. this is very nice one and gives indepth information. thanks for this nice articlehealth&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashley162010</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 06:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verified twitter followers script in python</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/verified-twitter-followers-script-in-python/#comment-146735557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a bug I found. Put that `if from_json['next_cursor'] == 0: break;` right after the for loop on followers. Otherwise you skip the last page of followers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Freedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another view on feature-creep</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/another-view-on-feature-creep/#comment-146735549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, another reason for feature creep: your base feature set isn't quite right or doesn't always work, but people are already using it, so you cobble on new features.  The dream is now users can solve more problems but don't have to change any of their existing workflow, but without an overhaul it doesn't quite work out that happily.  This happens all the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sameer Sundresh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another view on feature-creep</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/another-view-on-feature-creep/#comment-146735547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's true that a lot of creative software--a lot of products--are underused by most of their users.  This is particularly true with higher end products, which take a lot of effort on the user's part to get the full value out of them.I know of a large enterprise that paid a year's licensing fees for some high-end software and then didn't use it all year (but renewed and plan to get around to using it).  It would be interesting to see the numbers on how many purchasers of various things really fully use them.Another, totally different reason for feature creep is you might need a few specific features to make a sale to a particular account.  Think of all the obscure stuff in Microsoft Office, for example.  If you can check all the boxes, you win.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sameer Sundresh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verified twitter followers script in python</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/verified-twitter-followers-script-in-python/#comment-146735556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see you even kept the variables the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Freedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:09:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup idea: Pomodoro technique webapp</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2009/08/startup-idea-pomodoro-technique-webapp/#comment-146735774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote a very similar &lt;a href="posthttp://www.scottschulthess.com/coding/?p=233I" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="posthttp://www.scottschulthess.com/coding/?p=233I"&gt;posthttp://www.scottschulth...&lt;/a&gt; think I could make a rails app that does it pretty quickly.  If I do, I'll hit you up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Schulthess</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:49:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I've learned so far</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/what-ive-learned-so-far/#comment-146735576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've gotten ok with asking other people nearby with laptops if they could watch your stuff for a minute. Most people that look like they're doing what you're doing don't want to steal your stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Tulloss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I've learned so far</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/what-ive-learned-so-far/#comment-146735574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice picture!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathleen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:53:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I've learned so far</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/06/what-ive-learned-so-far/#comment-146735572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No one calls it "SF" in speech, but the do in writing.  When spoken, "SF" is pronounced "the city".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Gordon-Schlosberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reverse Engineering the newest Facebook invite virus</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/05/reverse-engineering-the-newest-facebook-invite-virus/#comment-146735644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, lotta people on here seem to need to prove they have bigger H4x0r epeens than you. I thought it was interesting. Good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reverse Engineering the newest Facebook invite virus</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/05/reverse-engineering-the-newest-facebook-invite-virus/#comment-146735641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Greg: At first glance, that looks extremely similar.  It might even be the exact same code, just obfuscated with a different naming scheme.  SocialGraphManager is there and the names of the variables are nearly identical to the ones from my original post.  When I have time, I'll verify this, but i'm guessing it's the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Paola</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reverse Engineering the newest Facebook invite virus</title><link>http://www.davezor.net/2010/05/reverse-engineering-the-newest-facebook-invite-virus/#comment-146735638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a new one that just started the rounds on hacked facebook accounts feel like reversing this one as well? It was too screw ball for my attention span:&lt;a href="http://pastebin.com/FeEdaz9S" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pastebin.com/FeEdaz9S"&gt;http://pastebin.com/FeEdaz9S&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>